24 Month Active Duty Limit Lifted for Reserve and Guard

In my opinion, it is far preferable to enlarge the active duty services than to lift limits on reserve and guard service, which in many cases is already being over utilized. From the AP via Military.com:

The Pentagon has abandoned its limit on the time a Citizen-Soldier can be required to serve on active duty. . .

[. . .]

The Pentagon also announced it is proposing to Congress that the size of the Army be increased by 65,000, to 547,000 and that the Marine Corps, the smallest of the services, grow by 27,000, to 202,000, over the next five years. No cost estimate was provided, but officials said it would be at least several billion dollars.

Until now, the Pentagon’s policy on the Guard or Reserve was that members’ cumulative time on active duty for the Iraq or Afghan wars could not exceed 24 months. That cumulative limit is now lifted; the remaining limit is on the length of any single mobilization, which may not exceed 24 consecutive months, Pace said.

In other words, a Citizen-Soldier could be mobilized for a 24-month stretch in Iraq or Afghanistan, then demobilized and allowed to return to civilian life, only to be mobilized a second time for as much as an additional 24 months. In practice, Pace said, the Pentagon intends to limit all future mobilizations to 12 months.

1 Response to “24 Month Active Duty Limit Lifted for Reserve and Guard”


  1. 1 Mark Jan 12th, 2007 at 9:28 pm

    Is this on DPRK Studies because the US military is increasingly becoming similar to the DPRK military in terms of length of service?

Leave a Reply





Recent Comments

  • Paleo guy: I lived in Colorado and the seashells are not from when the ice...
  • Javar: So much of this mess going i just found http://www.clintonlies.info Jav
  • Personal: lol. That’s simply amazing. Rather than allow their children...
  • Richard Payne: Col. Daughtry is my great uncle. He did take time to share...
  • Janus: I want one.
  • John Morris: Interesting find. Bill Clinton certainly has his way of using...
  • Richardson: Yes, it is! What are they afraid of?
  • usinkorea: That’s delicious in so many ways…

Recent Posts


Reassessing Rich and Poor
Seven Years
Saddam Bluffed, Didn't Have But Wanted WMD
Powerful Rail Gun Delivered to U.S. Navy
Where France is Right - Nuclear Power
Gmail vs. Yahoo Mail
Surprise! (not really) Guns Don't Equal Crime
The NYT Still Doesn't Get It





    Security, Politics, Etc.


    Best of the Web
    Black Five
    Counterterrorism Blog
    DPRK Studies
    Forward Deployed
    Gypsy Scholar
    MilBlogs
    Peaktalk
    Proliferation Press
    Real Clear Politics Blog
    The Long War Journal
    USinKorea's Journal

    Survival


    How To Be a Survivor
    Nuclear Survival by State
    Pragmatic Survivalist
    Survival Blog
    Survivalism

    Technology


    Engadget
    Gizmodo
    Lifehacker

    Think Tanks, Etc.


    American Enterprise Institute
    Brookings Institution
    CATO Institute
    Center for Defense Information
    Center for Strategic and Intl Studies
    Council on Foreign Relations
    Federation of American Scientists
    Global Security
    Heritage Foundation
    Middle East Media Research Institute
    RAND Corporation



    All Rights Reserved. © 2000-2007 DPRK Studies (dprkstudies.org).

    Bad Behavior has blocked 227 access attempts in the last 7 days.