Unfortunately this is a fairly consistent line of thinking in much of the Muslim world, and applies many of the same arguments that the DPRK employs. I won’t take the time to write any rebuttal; logic doesn’t seem to dent these sorts of arguments.
Search
Recent Comments
- Paleo guy: I lived in Colorado and the seashells are not from when the ice...
- Javar: So much of this mess going i just found http://www.clintonlies.info Jav
- Personal: lol. That’s simply amazing. Rather than allow their children...
- Richard Payne: Col. Daughtry is my great uncle. He did take time to share...
- Janus: I want one.
- John Morris: Interesting find. Bill Clinton certainly has his way of using...
- Richardson: Yes, it is! What are they afraid of?
- usinkorea: That’s delicious in so many ways…
Recent Posts
• Reassessing Rich and Poor
• Seven Years
• Saddam Bluffed, Didn't Have But Wanted WMD
• Powerful Rail Gun Delivered to U.S. Navy
• Where France is Right - Nuclear Power
• Gmail vs. Yahoo Mail
• Surprise! (not really) Guns Don't Equal Crime
• The NYT Still Doesn't Get It
Categories
Archives
Security, Politics, Etc.
• Best of the Web
• Black Five
• Counterterrorism Blog
• DPRK Studies
• Forward Deployed
• Gypsy Scholar
• MilBlogs
• Peaktalk
• Proliferation Press
• Real Clear Politics Blog
• The Long War Journal
• USinKorea's Journal
Survival
• How To Be a Survivor
• Nuclear Survival by State
• Pragmatic Survivalist
• Survival Blog
• Survivalism
Technology
• Engadget
• Gizmodo
• Lifehacker
Think Tanks, Etc.
• American Enterprise Institute
• Brookings Institution
• CATO Institute
• Center for Defense Information
• Center for Strategic and Intl Studies
• Council on Foreign Relations
• Federation of American Scientists
• Global Security
• Heritage Foundation
• Middle East Media Research Institute
• RAND Corporation

0 Responses to “An alternate point of view; nukes for all”